Suite results
Suite Score Avg / 20 Tests n tok/s Run
▶ General capability (13-task real-workload suite) 1a 244.4 / 260 18.8 13/13 n=5.3 114.8 run 2026-09-02
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| A1 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 10/20 | | 110.9 |
| A2 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 18/20 | | 114.9 |
| A3 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 20/20 | | 115.3 |
| A4 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 19/20 | | 116.8 |
| A5 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 20/20 | | 117.8 |
| A6 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 20/20 | | 118.3 |
| B1 | Document Processing | 20/20 | | 115.6 |
| B2 | Document Processing | 20/20 | | 111.1 |
| B3 | Document Processing | 20/20 | | 104.3 |
| C1 | Content Production | 20/20 | | 109.5 |
| C2 | Content Production | 18/20 | | 101.7 |
| C3 | Content Production | 18/20 | | 102.1 |
| C4 | Content Production | 20/20 | | 113 |
Category mean Dev/Ops Scripting 17.8Document Processing 20Content Production 19
▶ Agentic tool-calling & protocol adherence 1b 124.8 / 160 15.6 8/8 n=4 122.5 run 2026-09-12
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| WA1 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 95.2 |
| WA2 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 106.7 |
| WA3 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 111.1 |
| WA4 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 109 |
| WA5 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 5/20 | | 116.5 |
| WB1 | Agent Robustness & State Management | 20/20 | | 116.6 |
| WB2 | Agent Robustness & State Management | 20/20 | | 125.9 |
| WB3 | Agent Robustness & State Management | 0/20 | | 105.6 |
Category mean Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 17Agent Robustness & State Management 13.3
▶ Coding depth 1c 173.7 / 180 19.3 9/9 n=1 117.8 run 2026-09-15
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| K1 | Coding — Concurrency | 20/20 | | 128.7 |
| K2 | Coding — Algorithms | 20/20 | | 123.9 |
| K3 | Coding — Security Review | 20/20 | | 120.7 |
| K4 | Coding — Performance | 18/20 | | 121.6 |
| K5 | Coding — Refactoring Under Constraints | 20/20 | | 102 |
| K6 | Coding — Test Writing | 20/20 | | 97.7 |
| K7 | Coding — React Component (typed) | 17/20 | | 116.8 |
| K8 | Coding — TypeScript Type System | 20/20 | | 117.2 |
| K9 | Coding — React Debugging | 19/20 | | 120.4 |
Category mean Coding — Concurrency 20Coding — Algorithms 20Coding — Security Review 20Coding — Performance 18Coding — Refactoring Under Constraints 20Coding — Test Writing 20Coding — React Component (typed) 17Coding — TypeScript Type System 20Coding — React Debugging 19
▶ Doc/OCR vision 1d 160 / 160 20 8/8 n=1 112.2 run 2026-09-20
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| D1 | Doc/OCR — Transcription | 20/20 | | 73.3 |
| D2 | Doc/OCR — Document QA | 20/20 | | 90.8 |
| D3 | Doc/OCR — Field Extraction | 20/20 | | 74.2 |
| D4 | Doc/OCR — Document QA | 20/20 | | 105.8 |
| D5 | Doc/OCR — Transcription | 20/20 | | 71.3 |
| D6 | Doc/OCR — Field Extraction | 20/20 | | 66.9 |
| D7 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Input | 20/20 | | 107.3 |
| D8 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Input | 20/20 | | 89.4 |
Category mean Doc/OCR — Transcription 20Doc/OCR — Document QA 20Doc/OCR — Field Extraction 20Doc/OCR — Degraded Input 20
▶ Doc/OCR — real-degraded tier 1d2 64.8 / 80 16.2 4/4 n=1 73.9 run 2026-09-20
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| D9 | Doc/OCR — Real Degraded Transcription | 13/20 | | 46.3 |
| D10 | Doc/OCR — Handwriting Extraction | 18/20 | | 25.6 |
| D11 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Table Transcription | 14/20 | | 56 |
| D12 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Table QA | 20/20 | | 104.3 |
Category mean Doc/OCR — Real Degraded Transcription 13Doc/OCR — Handwriting Extraction 18Doc/OCR — Degraded Table Transcription 14Doc/OCR — Degraded Table QA 20
▶ Content-production depth 1e 115.2 / 120 19.2 6/6 n=1 127 run 2026-09-16
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| E1 | SOW & Requirements Decomposition | 20/20 | | 127.9 |
| E2 | SOW & Requirements Decomposition | 20/20 | | 131.6 |
| E3 | Executive & Proposal Content | 20/20 | | 125.6 |
| E4 | Executive & Proposal Content | 19/20 | | 130.7 |
| E5 | Executive & Proposal Content | 16/20 | | 116.3 |
| E6 | Executive & Proposal Content | 20/20 | | 121.6 |
Category mean SOW & Requirements Decomposition 20Executive & Proposal Content 18.8
▶ Long-context retrieval & synthesis 1g 120 / 120 20 6/6 n=1 113.7 run 2026-08-06
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| L1 | Long-Context — Needle Retrieval | 20/20 | | 88.7 |
| L2 | Long-Context — Grounded QA with Distractors | 20/20 | | 88.3 |
| L3 | Long-Context — Ops Log Reasoning | 20/20 | | 70 |
| L4 | Long-Context — Faithful Summarization | 20/20 | | 90.3 |
| L5 | Long-Context — Instruction Retention | 20/20 | | 80.8 |
| L6 | Long-Context — Full-Haystack QA | 20/20 | | 31.4 |
Category mean Long-Context — Needle Retrieval 20Long-Context — Grounded QA with Distractors 20Long-Context — Ops Log Reasoning 20Long-Context — Faithful Summarization 20Long-Context — Instruction Retention 20Long-Context — Full-Haystack QA 20
▶ Long-context multi-needle (MRCR) 1g2 44.1 / 60 14.7 3/3 n=1 88.3 run 2026-08-14
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| L7 | Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) | 20/20 | | 65 |
| L8 | Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) | 20/20 | | 51.3 |
| L9 | Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) | 4/20 | | 45.2 |
▶ Live one-shot builds (runtime-verified) 1h 75.2 / 80 18.8 4/4 n=1 115.4 run 2026-08-15
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| H1 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 18/20 | | 101.1 |
| H2 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 19/20 | | 121.1 |
| H3 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 18/20 | | 108.7 |
| H4 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 20/20 | | 109.8 |
▶ Production replay (real agent workload) 1i 153.6 / 240 12.8 12/12 n=1 76 run 2026-09-26
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| I1 | Nightly Fix Replay | 0/20 | | 87.5 |
| I2 | Nightly Fix Replay | 0/20 | | 67.7 |
| I3 | Nightly Fix Replay | 8/20 | | 63.3 |
| I4 | Nightly Fix Replay | 16/20 | | 70.9 |
| I5 | Nightly Fix Replay | 14/20 | | 58 |
| I6 | Nightly Fix Replay | 13/20 | | 61.1 |
| I7 | Audit Judgment | 15/20 | | 82.4 |
| I8 | Audit Judgment | 20/20 | | 89.7 |
| I9 | Cron Dependency Reasoning | 19/20 | | 75.5 |
| I10 | Cron Dependency Reasoning | 17/20 | | 71.5 |
| I11 | Curation Judgment | 13/20 | | 76.2 |
| I12 | Curation Judgment | 19/20 | | 87.6 |
Category mean Nightly Fix Replay 8.5Audit Judgment 17.5Cron Dependency Reasoning 18Curation Judgment 16
▶ Brand-constrained static build (negative-constraint adherence) 1j 93.5 / 100 18.7 5/5 n=3.6 125.9 run 2026-09-13
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| J1 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 20/20 | | 122.5 |
| J3 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 17/20 | | 122.9 |
| J4 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 20/20 | | 130.2 |
| J5 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 16/20 | | 124.3 |
| J6 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 20/20 | | 122.6 |
Each test is LLM-judged 0–20 against a fixed rubric; suite max = tests × 20.
An ADJ chip marks a cell carrying a subjective
adjustment from the maintainer; the judged score is the one shown, is unchanged,
and remains what the axes, ranks and tie bands are computed from. Hover for the reason.
Rows with a ▶ expand to the per-test breakdown.
Where fewer tests ran than the suite total, unrun tests count as zero toward the axis score.
See methodology.