← Leaderboard

Ornith-1.0-35B 4bit MLX

Retired Rank #22 of 53 · 7/8 GAUNTLET progress
Generalist — 86.3 / 100 G Agentic — 98 / 100 A Understanding — 94.7 / 100 U Needle — 90.2 / 100 N Thinking — pending T Live — 90.4 / 100 L Engineering — 99 / 100 E Throughput — 35.8 / 100 T

Hollow markers & dashed spokes: axis not yet scored

G
86.3
A
98
U
94.7
N
90.2
T
n/d
L
90.4
E
99
T
35.8

Specification

Parameters
35B total (MoE; active-per-token not confirmed in model card)
Architecture
qwen3_5_moe
Size on disk
20.4 GB
Quantization
4bit
Format
MLX
Runtime
LM Studio
Class
Standard
Reasoning (CoT)
Yes — emits reasoning tokens
Internal ID
M28
Mean speed
122.9 tok/s across suites
Model card
huggingface.co

Suite results

Suite Score Avg / 20 Tests n tok/s Run
General capability (13-task real-workload suite) 1a 224.4 / 260 18.7 12/13 ● n=1.1 124.4 run 2026-08-22
Test Category Score tok/s
A1 Dev/Ops Scripting 14/20 117.5
A2 Dev/Ops Scripting 14/20 124
A3 Dev/Ops Scripting 20/20 121.6
A4 Dev/Ops Scripting 20/20 121.4
A5 Dev/Ops Scripting 20/20 128.3
A6 Dev/Ops Scripting 20/20 121.1
B1 Document Processing 19/20 123.8
B2 Document Processing 20/20 121.5
C1 Content Production 20/20 112.2
C2 Content Production 18/20 109.7
C3 Content Production 19/20 111.5
C4 Content Production 20/20 113.7

Category mean Dev/Ops Scripting 18Document Processing 19.5Content Production 19.3

Agentic tool-calling & protocol adherence 1b 156.8 / 160 19.6 8/8 n=1 134.6 run 2026-08-22
Test Category Score tok/s
WA1 Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 20/20 109.3
WA2 Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 20/20 99.3
WA3 Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 20/20 114.1
WA4 Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 20/20 83
WA5 Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 20/20 115.3
WB1 Agent Robustness & State Management 20/20 127.3
WB2 Agent Robustness & State Management 20/20 126.8
WB3 Agent Robustness & State Management 17/20 123.4

Category mean Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 20Agent Robustness & State Management 19

Coding depth 1c 178.2 / 180 19.8 9/9 n=1 128.9 run 2026-09-19
Test Category Score tok/s
K1 Coding — Concurrency 20/20 129.5
K2 Coding — Algorithms 20/20 133.2
K3 Coding — Security Review 18/20 131.4
K4 Coding — Performance 20/20 131.8
K5 Coding — Refactoring Under Constraints 20/20 130.7
K6 Coding — Test Writing 20/20 123.2
K7 Coding — React Component (typed) 20/20 118.9
K8 Coding — TypeScript Type System 20/20 124.3
K9 Coding — React Debugging 20/20 124.2

Category mean Coding — Concurrency 20Coding — Algorithms 20Coding — Security Review 18Coding — Performance 20Coding — Refactoring Under Constraints 20Coding — Test Writing 20Coding — React Component (typed) 20Coding — TypeScript Type System 20Coding — React Debugging 20

Doc/OCR vision 1d 160 / 160 20 8/8 n=1 125.7 run 2026-09-18
Test Category Score tok/s
D1 Doc/OCR — Transcription 20/20 71.9
D2 Doc/OCR — Document QA 20/20 80.6
D3 Doc/OCR — Field Extraction 20/20 85.2
D4 Doc/OCR — Document QA 20/20 106.7
D5 Doc/OCR — Transcription 20/20 106
D6 Doc/OCR — Field Extraction 20/20 98.3
D7 Doc/OCR — Degraded Input 20/20 90.7
D8 Doc/OCR — Degraded Input 20/20 110.8

Category mean Doc/OCR — Transcription 20Doc/OCR — Document QA 20Doc/OCR — Field Extraction 20Doc/OCR — Degraded Input 20

Doc/OCR — real-degraded tier 1d2 67.2 / 80 16.8 4/4 n=1 121.4 run 2026-09-17
Test Category Score tok/s
D9 Doc/OCR — Real Degraded Transcription 15/20 84.6
D10 Doc/OCR — Handwriting Extraction 18/20 83.7
D11 Doc/OCR — Degraded Table Transcription 14/20 112
D12 Doc/OCR — Degraded Table QA 20/20 103.6

Category mean Doc/OCR — Real Degraded Transcription 15Doc/OCR — Handwriting Extraction 18Doc/OCR — Degraded Table Transcription 14Doc/OCR — Degraded Table QA 20

Content-production depth 1e 115.8 / 120 19.3 6/6 n=1 123.1 run 2026-09-18
Test Category Score tok/s
E1 SOW & Requirements Decomposition 20/20 129.5
E2 SOW & Requirements Decomposition 20/20 128
E3 Executive & Proposal Content 18/20 119.4
E4 Executive & Proposal Content 20/20 114
E5 Executive & Proposal Content 20/20 118.1
E6 Executive & Proposal Content 18/20 121.6

Category mean SOW & Requirements Decomposition 20Executive & Proposal Content 19

Long-context retrieval & synthesis 1g 118.2 / 120 19.7 6/6 n=1 116.3 run 2026-09-18
Test Category Score tok/s
L1 Long-Context — Needle Retrieval 20/20 93.3
L2 Long-Context — Grounded QA with Distractors 20/20 76.4
L3 Long-Context — Ops Log Reasoning 18/20 68.9
L4 Long-Context — Faithful Summarization 20/20 94.7
L5 Long-Context — Instruction Retention 20/20 72.9
L6 Long-Context — Full-Haystack QA 20/20 39

Category mean Long-Context — Needle Retrieval 20Long-Context — Grounded QA with Distractors 20Long-Context — Ops Log Reasoning 18Long-Context — Faithful Summarization 20Long-Context — Instruction Retention 20Long-Context — Full-Haystack QA 20

Long-context multi-needle (MRCR) 1g2 44.1 / 60 14.7 3/3 n=1 101.7 run 2026-09-16
Test Category Score tok/s
L7 Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) 20/20 93.2
L8 Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) 20/20 61.2
L9 Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) 4/20 48.8
Live one-shot builds (runtime-verified) 1h 72.8 / 80 18.2 4/4 n=1 123.3 run 2026-09-16
Test Category Score tok/s
H1 Web-Estate One-Shot Builds 19/20 126.2
H2 Web-Estate One-Shot Builds 19/20 127
H3 Web-Estate One-Shot Builds 17/20 122
H4 Web-Estate One-Shot Builds 18/20 114.3
Brand-constrained static build (negative-constraint adherence) 1j 90 / 100 18 5/5 n=1 129.9 run 2026-09-15
Test Category Score tok/s
J1 Brand-Constrained Static Build 20/20 129.3
J3 Brand-Constrained Static Build 20/20 131.4
J4 Brand-Constrained Static Build 20/20 124.4
J5 Brand-Constrained Static Build 12/20 124.3
J6 Brand-Constrained Static Build 18/20 123.8

Each test is LLM-judged 0–20 against a fixed rubric; suite max = tests × 20. An ADJ chip marks a cell carrying a subjective adjustment from the maintainer; the judged score is the one shown, is unchanged, and remains what the axes, ranks and tie bands are computed from. Hover for the reason. Rows with a ▶ expand to the per-test breakdown. Where fewer tests ran than the suite total, unrun tests count as zero toward the axis score. See methodology.