Suite results
Suite Score Avg / 20 Tests n tok/s Run
▶ General capability (13-task real-workload suite) 1a 224.4 / 260 18.7 12/13 ● n=1.1 124.4 run 2026-08-22
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| A1 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 14/20 | | 117.5 |
| A2 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 14/20 | | 124 |
| A3 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 20/20 | | 121.6 |
| A4 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 20/20 | | 121.4 |
| A5 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 20/20 | | 128.3 |
| A6 | Dev/Ops Scripting | 20/20 | | 121.1 |
| B1 | Document Processing | 19/20 | | 123.8 |
| B2 | Document Processing | 20/20 | | 121.5 |
| C1 | Content Production | 20/20 | | 112.2 |
| C2 | Content Production | 18/20 | | 109.7 |
| C3 | Content Production | 19/20 | | 111.5 |
| C4 | Content Production | 20/20 | | 113.7 |
Category mean Dev/Ops Scripting 18Document Processing 19.5Content Production 19.3
▶ Agentic tool-calling & protocol adherence 1b 156.8 / 160 19.6 8/8 n=1 134.6 run 2026-08-22
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| WA1 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 109.3 |
| WA2 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 99.3 |
| WA3 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 114.1 |
| WA4 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 83 |
| WA5 | Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence | 20/20 | | 115.3 |
| WB1 | Agent Robustness & State Management | 20/20 | | 127.3 |
| WB2 | Agent Robustness & State Management | 20/20 | | 126.8 |
| WB3 | Agent Robustness & State Management | 17/20 | | 123.4 |
Category mean Tool Calling & Protocol Adherence 20Agent Robustness & State Management 19
▶ Coding depth 1c 178.2 / 180 19.8 9/9 n=1 128.9 run 2026-09-19
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| K1 | Coding — Concurrency | 20/20 | | 129.5 |
| K2 | Coding — Algorithms | 20/20 | | 133.2 |
| K3 | Coding — Security Review | 18/20 | | 131.4 |
| K4 | Coding — Performance | 20/20 | | 131.8 |
| K5 | Coding — Refactoring Under Constraints | 20/20 | | 130.7 |
| K6 | Coding — Test Writing | 20/20 | | 123.2 |
| K7 | Coding — React Component (typed) | 20/20 | | 118.9 |
| K8 | Coding — TypeScript Type System | 20/20 | | 124.3 |
| K9 | Coding — React Debugging | 20/20 | | 124.2 |
Category mean Coding — Concurrency 20Coding — Algorithms 20Coding — Security Review 18Coding — Performance 20Coding — Refactoring Under Constraints 20Coding — Test Writing 20Coding — React Component (typed) 20Coding — TypeScript Type System 20Coding — React Debugging 20
▶ Doc/OCR vision 1d 160 / 160 20 8/8 n=1 125.7 run 2026-09-18
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| D1 | Doc/OCR — Transcription | 20/20 | | 71.9 |
| D2 | Doc/OCR — Document QA | 20/20 | | 80.6 |
| D3 | Doc/OCR — Field Extraction | 20/20 | | 85.2 |
| D4 | Doc/OCR — Document QA | 20/20 | | 106.7 |
| D5 | Doc/OCR — Transcription | 20/20 | | 106 |
| D6 | Doc/OCR — Field Extraction | 20/20 | | 98.3 |
| D7 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Input | 20/20 | | 90.7 |
| D8 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Input | 20/20 | | 110.8 |
Category mean Doc/OCR — Transcription 20Doc/OCR — Document QA 20Doc/OCR — Field Extraction 20Doc/OCR — Degraded Input 20
▶ Doc/OCR — real-degraded tier 1d2 67.2 / 80 16.8 4/4 n=1 121.4 run 2026-09-17
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| D9 | Doc/OCR — Real Degraded Transcription | 15/20 | | 84.6 |
| D10 | Doc/OCR — Handwriting Extraction | 18/20 | | 83.7 |
| D11 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Table Transcription | 14/20 | | 112 |
| D12 | Doc/OCR — Degraded Table QA | 20/20 | | 103.6 |
Category mean Doc/OCR — Real Degraded Transcription 15Doc/OCR — Handwriting Extraction 18Doc/OCR — Degraded Table Transcription 14Doc/OCR — Degraded Table QA 20
▶ Content-production depth 1e 115.8 / 120 19.3 6/6 n=1 123.1 run 2026-09-18
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| E1 | SOW & Requirements Decomposition | 20/20 | | 129.5 |
| E2 | SOW & Requirements Decomposition | 20/20 | | 128 |
| E3 | Executive & Proposal Content | 18/20 | | 119.4 |
| E4 | Executive & Proposal Content | 20/20 | | 114 |
| E5 | Executive & Proposal Content | 20/20 | | 118.1 |
| E6 | Executive & Proposal Content | 18/20 | | 121.6 |
Category mean SOW & Requirements Decomposition 20Executive & Proposal Content 19
▶ Long-context retrieval & synthesis 1g 118.2 / 120 19.7 6/6 n=1 116.3 run 2026-09-18
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| L1 | Long-Context — Needle Retrieval | 20/20 | | 93.3 |
| L2 | Long-Context — Grounded QA with Distractors | 20/20 | | 76.4 |
| L3 | Long-Context — Ops Log Reasoning | 18/20 | | 68.9 |
| L4 | Long-Context — Faithful Summarization | 20/20 | | 94.7 |
| L5 | Long-Context — Instruction Retention | 20/20 | | 72.9 |
| L6 | Long-Context — Full-Haystack QA | 20/20 | | 39 |
Category mean Long-Context — Needle Retrieval 20Long-Context — Grounded QA with Distractors 20Long-Context — Ops Log Reasoning 18Long-Context — Faithful Summarization 20Long-Context — Instruction Retention 20Long-Context — Full-Haystack QA 20
▶ Long-context multi-needle (MRCR) 1g2 44.1 / 60 14.7 3/3 n=1 101.7 run 2026-09-16
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| L7 | Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) | 20/20 | | 93.2 |
| L8 | Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) | 20/20 | | 61.2 |
| L9 | Long-Context — Multi-Needle Retrieval (MRCR) | 4/20 | | 48.8 |
▶ Live one-shot builds (runtime-verified) 1h 72.8 / 80 18.2 4/4 n=1 123.3 run 2026-09-16
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| H1 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 19/20 | | 126.2 |
| H2 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 19/20 | | 127 |
| H3 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 17/20 | | 122 |
| H4 | Web-Estate One-Shot Builds | 18/20 | | 114.3 |
▶ Brand-constrained static build (negative-constraint adherence) 1j 90 / 100 18 5/5 n=1 129.9 run 2026-09-15
| Test | Category | Score | | tok/s |
| J1 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 20/20 | | 129.3 |
| J3 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 20/20 | | 131.4 |
| J4 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 20/20 | | 124.4 |
| J5 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 12/20 | | 124.3 |
| J6 | Brand-Constrained Static Build | 18/20 | | 123.8 |
Each test is LLM-judged 0–20 against a fixed rubric; suite max = tests × 20.
An ADJ chip marks a cell carrying a subjective
adjustment from the maintainer; the judged score is the one shown, is unchanged,
and remains what the axes, ranks and tie bands are computed from. Hover for the reason.
Rows with a ▶ expand to the per-test breakdown.
Where fewer tests ran than the suite total, unrun tests count as zero toward the axis score.
See methodology.